Tuesday, May 24, 2016

protect your cordless phones / anil kumar lines

linestelecom/ india...whatsapp 00 91 9387648171

This article will educate you on how you can protect yourself from people who, for some reason, want to eavesdrop on your conversations by way of your cordless phone. Now, it's best to remind you that eavesdropping on other people's phone conversations is punishable by law. It's absolutely illegal! That's true in most countries of the world. I'll be blunt—don't attempt it. Don't even think about it. (Like you need telling!)
Old and reliable land line is still alive and dandy, in spite of all of the unlimited minute cellphone plans available today. Most homes still choose to cling to the old standard home phone land line. Most likely as a backup, or for longer conversations, and for a more reliable signal.
Several decades ago, cordless phones are a luxury, but, now, have become a necessity for most of us who use land lines, but who also want the freedom to move around while having conversations. The 21st century man have become so accustomed to the wireless lifestyle of this generation that the thought of using phones with cords seems, now, only fitted to the Flintstones!
No doubt about it cordless phone technology has advanced and have made leaps and bounds in the past years. Earlier models used primitive AM radio-based systems with almost no security features, now, these gadgets are equipped with digital systems with built-in encryption tech to prevent prying ears.
Is your cordless phone secure? If it is, how secure is it?
Can someone easily listen in on your cordless phone conversations? Or how easy is it for anyone to do this? The intelligent answer to this question depends on what technology your phone is using. If it's analog, then your calls can be easily intercepted. Newer phones use digital technology which utilizes 'Digital Spread Spectrum' (DSS) or DECT. Unless your phone specifies this, then your phone is analog.
While it's true that cordless phone models with analog tech are the most vulnerable to prying ears, digital phones are not completely protected from third intruders listening in.
Research about security and phone hackers have managed to hack some implementations of DECT communications standard being used by most cordless phone makers. Unfortunately, DECT which was thought of as a quite secure system has lost it's glory when hackers were able to crack the encryption implementation being utilized by a number of cordless phone makers.
Hackers usually use software applications and specialized hardware to listen to conversations on cordless DECT-based phones. The tool they use is an open source device specially made for auditors and security researchers and included in legitimate security tool suites such as the BackTrack Linux-live security distribution. The hacking software, combined with hard to find and specialized DECT-capable wireless network cards, or sometimes universal software radios are perfect for intercepting and decoding conversations on certain models of vulnerable DECT-based cordless phones.
The DECT standard is now evolving the standard to improve security measures, but improvements take a little time to apply and make them available to the commercial market.
Guard against cordless phone hackers
Casual hackers or script kids can't just pursue DECT hacking. They can't use the tools without extremely specialized radio hardware. The radio hardware required to intercept DECT traffic is not cheap and is hard to locate and the new universal software radios available and capable intercepting DECT calls can be on the high end with regards prices.
Unless you're a immensely high value target that is guarding classified info or top secret files then the risk of hackers listening in on your calls using DECT-based cordless phone is most probably low. An illegal eavesdropper must find a way to be get close to your location to pick up a signal.
Are you worried about nosy neighbors listening in on your calls? Then you must upgrade your grandma's old cordless phone (most probably analog) to digitally based designed phone. This will prevent most incidental crosstalk eavesdroppers.
If you are super paranoid about someone listening to your calls, then you may want to use either a corded phone (yes, they are still existing) or encrypted VOIP services. Kryptos is highly recommended.
Now, let's look at the bottom line. As long as you are using a digital cordless phone manufactured in the past few years, hackers and other eavesdropping toms being able to listen to your calls are quite slim. Given the scarcity of the hardware required they are also expensive. Hackers are more predisposed to try hacking your voicemail, rather than listen to your calls..The content of this article not applicable in some states only/ anil kumar lines/ linestelecom

laser in communication / anil kumar lines

google search:linestelecom/Optical fibers can be used to transmit light and thus information over long ditelestances. Fiber-based systems have largely replaced radio transmitter systems for long-haul optical data transmission. They are widely used for telephony, but also for Internet traffic, long high-speed local area networks (LANs), cable TV (CATV), and increasingly also for shorter distances within buildings. In most cases, silica fibers are used, except for very short distances, where plastic optical fibers can be advantageous.
Compared with systems based on electrical cables, the approach of optical fiber communications (lightwave communications) has advantages, the most important of which are:
See also our useful tutorial "Passive Fiber Optics"! This explains many aspects of fiber optics using interesting simulations.
  • The capacity of fibers for data transmission is huge: a single silica fiber can carry hundreds of thousands of telephone channels, utilizing only a small part of the theoretical capacity. In the last 30 years, the progress concerning transmission capacities of fiber links has been significantly faster than e.g. the progress in the speed or storage capacity of computers.
  • The losses for light propagating in fibers are amazingly small: ≈ 0.2 dB/km for modern single-mode silica fibers, so that many tens of kilometers can be bridged without amplifying the signals.
  • A large number of channels can be reamplified in a single fiber amplifier, if required for very large transmission distances.
  • Due to the huge transmission rate achievable, the cost per transported bit can be extremely low.
  • Compared with electrical cables, fiber-optic cables are very lightweight.
  • Fiber-optic cables are immune to problems that arise with electrical cables, such as ground loops or electromagnetic interference (EMI). Such issues are important, for example, for data links in industrial environments.
Mostly due to their very high data transmission capacity, fiber-optic transmission systems can achieve a much lower cost than systems based on coaxial copper cables, if high data rates are needed. For low data rates, where their full transmission capacity cannot be utilized, fiber-optic systems may have less of an economic advantage, or may even be more expensive (not due to the fibers, but the additional transceivers). The primary reason, however, for the still widespread use of copper cables for the “last mile” (the connection to the homes and offices) is simply that copper cables are already laid out, whereas new digging operations would be required to lay down additional fiber cables.
Fiber communications are already extensively used within metropolitan areas (metro fiber links), and even fiber to the home (FTTH) spreads more and more – particularly in Japan, where private Internet users can already obtain affordable Internet connections with data rates of 100 Mbit/s – well above the performance of current ADSL systems, which use electrical telephone lines. In other countries, one often tries to squeeze out higher transmission capacities from existing copper cables, e.g. with the technique of vectoring, in order to avoid the cost of laying down fiber cables to the premises. This, however, is more and more seen only as a temporary solution, which cannot satisfy further growth of bandwidth demand.

− Telecom Windows

Optical fiber communications typically operate in a wavelength region corresponding to one of the following “telecom windows”:
  • The first window at 800–900 nm was originally used. GaAs/AlGaAs-based laser diodes and light-emitting diodes (LEDs) served as transmitters, and silicon photodiodes were suitable for the receivers. However, the fiber losses are relatively high in this region, andfiber amplifiers are not well developed for this spectral region. Therefore, the first telecom window is suitable only for short-distance transmission.
  • The second telecom window utilizes wavelengths around 1.3 μm, where the loss of silica fibers is much lower and the fibers' chromatic dispersion is very weak, so that dispersive broadening is minimized. This window was originally used for long-haul transmission. However, fiber amplifiers for 1.3 μm (based on, e.g. on praseodymium-doped glass) are not as good as their 1.5-μm counterparts based on erbium. Also, low dispersion is not necessarily ideal for long-haul transmission, as it can increase the effect of optical nonlinearities.
  • The third telecom window, which is now very widely used, utilizes wavelengths around 1.5 μm. The losses of silica fibers are lowest in this region, and erbium-doped fiber amplifiers are available which offer very high performance. Fiber dispersion is usually anomalous but can be tailored with great flexibility (→ dispersion-shifted fibers).
The second and third telecom windows are further subdivided into the following wavelength bands:
BandDescriptionWavelength range
O bandoriginal1260–1360 nm
E bandextended1360–1460 nm
S bandshort wavelengths1460–1530 nm
C bandconventional (“erbium window”)1530–1565 nm
L bandlong wavelengths1565–1625 nm
U bandultralong wavelengths1625–1675 nm
The second and third telecom windows were originally separated by a pronounced loss peak around 1.4 μm, but they can effectively be joined with advanced fibers with low OH content which do not exhibit this peak...linestelecom@gmail.com

optical/ fibre optic receivers

google search "LINESTELECOM"

The main component of an optical receiver is a photodetector, which converts light into electricity using the photoelectric effect. The primary photodetectors for telecommunications are made from Indium gallium arsenide The photodetector is typically a semiconductor-based photodiode. Several types of photodiodes include p-n photodiodes, p-i-n photodiodes, and avalanche photodiodes. Metal-semiconductor-metal (MSM) photodetectors are also used due to their suitability for circuit integration inregenerators and wavelength-division multiplexers.
Optical-electrical converters are typically coupled with a transimpedance amplifier and a limiting amplifier to produce a digital signal in the electrical domain from the incoming optical signal, which may be attenuated and distorted while passing through the channel. Further signal processing such as clock recovery from data (CDR) performed by aphase-locked loop may also be applied before the data is passed on.

Fiber cable types

A cable reel trailer with conduit that can carry optical fiber
Multi-mode optical fiber in an underground service pit
Main articles: Optical fiber and Optical fiber cable
An optical fiber cable consists of a core, cladding, and a buffer (a protective outer coating), in which the cladding guides the light along the core by using the method of total internal reflection. The core and the cladding (which has a lower-refractive-index) are usually made of high-quality silica glass, although they can both be made of plastic as well. Connecting two optical fibers is done by fusion splicing or mechanical splicing and requires special skills and interconnection technology due to the microscopic precision required to align the fiber cores.[9]
Two main types of optical fiber used in optic communications include multi-mode optical fibers and single-mode optical fibers. A multi-mode optical fiber has a larger core (≥ 50 micrometers), allowing less precise, cheaper transmitters and receivers to connect to it as well as cheaper connectors. However, a multi-mode fiber introduces multimode distortion, which often limits the bandwidth and length of the link. Furthermore, because of its higher dopant content, multi-mode fibers are usually expensive and exhibit higher attenuation. The core of a single-mode fiber is smaller (<10 allows="" and="" but="" components="" expensive="" higher-performance="" interconnection="" links.="" longer="" methods="" micrometers="" more="" much="" p="" requires="">
In order to package fiber into a commercially viable product, it typically is protectively coated by using ultraviolet (UV), light-cured acrylate polymers, then terminated with optical fiber connectors, and finally assembled into a cable. After that, it can be laid in the ground and then run through the walls of a building and deployed aerially in a manner similar to copper cables. These fibers require less maintenance than common twisted pair wires, once they are deployed.[10]
Specialized cables are used for long distance subsea data transmission, e.g. transatlantic communications cable. New (2011–2013) cables operated by commercial enterprises (Emerald AtlantisHibernia Atlantic) typically have four strands of fiber and cross the Atlantic (NYC-London) in 60-70ms. Cost of each such cable was about $300M in 2011. source: The Chronicle Herald.
Another common practice is to bundle many fiber optic strands within long-distance power transmission cable. This exploits power transmission rights of way effectively, ensures a power company can own and control the fiber required to monitor its own devices and lines, is effectively immune to tampering, and simplifies the deployment of smart grid technology.,..anil kumar lines

anil kumar lines / ON FIBRE OPTIC TRANSMITTERS

Dear Readers,,We Are Awaiting For Your Comments In "landline Industry" LINESTELECOM

GOOGLE SEARCH US AT LINESTELECOM

The most commonly used optical transmitters are semiconductor devices such as light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and laser diodes. The difference between LEDs and laser diodes is that LEDs produce incoherent light, while laser diodes produce coherent light. For use in optical communications, semiconductor optical transmitters must be designed to be compact, efficient, and reliable, while operating in an optimal wavelength range, and directly modulated at high frequencies.
In its simplest form, a LED is a forward-biased p-n junction, emitting light through spontaneous emission, a phenomenon referred to aselectroluminescence. The emitted light is incoherent with a relatively wide spectral width of 30-60 nm. LED light transmission is also inefficient, with only about 1%[citation needed] of input power, or about 100 microwatts, eventually converted into launched power which has been coupled into the optical fiber. However, due to their relatively simple design, LEDs are very useful for low-cost applications.
Communications LEDs are most commonly made from Indium gallium arsenide phosphide (InGaAsP) or gallium arsenide (GaAs). Because InGaAsP LEDs operate at a longer wavelength than GaAs LEDs (1.3 micrometers vs. 0.81-0.87 micrometers), their output spectrum, while equivalent in energy is wider in wavelength terms by a factor of about 1.7. The large spectrum width of LEDs is subject to higher fiber dispersion, considerably limiting their bit rate-distance product (a common measure of usefulness). LEDs are suitable primarily for local-area-network applications with bit rates of 10-100 Mbit/s and transmission distances of a few kilometers. LEDs have also been developed that use several quantum wells to emit light at different wavelengths over a broad spectrum, and are currently in use for local-area WDM (Wavelength-Division Multiplexing) networks.
Today, LEDs have been largely superseded by VCSEL (Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Laser) devices, which offer improved speed, power and spectral properties, at a similar cost. Common VCSEL devices couple well to multi mode fiber.
A semiconductor laser emits light through stimulated emission rather than spontaneous emission, which results in high output power (~100 mW) as well as other benefits related to the nature of coherent light. The output of a laser is relatively directional, allowing high coupling efficiency (~50 %) into single-mode fiber. The narrow spectral width also allows for high bit rates since it reduces the effect of chromatic dispersion. Furthermore, semiconductor lasers can be modulated directly at high frequencies because of shortrecombination time.
Commonly used classes of semiconductor laser transmitters used in fiber optics include VCSEL (Vertical-Cavity Surface-Emitting Laser), Fabry–Pérot and DFB (Distributed Feed Back).
Laser diodes are often directly modulated, that is the light output is controlled by a current applied directly to the device. For very high data rates or very long distance links, a laser source may be operated continuous wave, and the light modulated by an external device such as an electro-absorption modulator or Mach–Zehnder interferometer. External modulation increases the achievable link distance by eliminating laser chirp, which broadens the linewidth of directly modulated lasers, increasing the chromatic dispersion in the fiber.
transceiver is a device combining a transmitter and a receiver in a single housing ..ANIL KUMAR LINES

fibre optic communication / anil kumar lines

In 1880 Alexander Graham Bell and his assistant Charles Sumner Tainter created a very early precursor to fiber-optic communications, the Photophone, at Bell's newly established Volta Laboratory in Washington, D.C. Bell considered it his most important invention. The device allowed for the transmission of sound on a beam of light. On June 3, 1880, Bell conducted the world's first wireless telephone transmission between two buildings, some 213 meters apart.[4][5] Due to its use of an atmospheric transmission medium, the Photophone would not prove practical until advances in laser and optical fiber technologies permitted the secure transport of light. The Photophone's first practical use came in military communication systems many decades later.
In 1954 Harold Hopkins and Narinder Singh Kapany showed that rolled fiber glass allowed light to be transmitted. Initially it was considered that the light can traverse in only straight medium.[clarification needed][citation needed]
In 1966 Charles K. Kao and George Hockham proposed optical fibers at STC Laboratories (STL) at Harlow, England, when they showed that the losses of 1000 dB/km in existing glass (compared to 5-10 dB/km in coaxial cable) was due to contaminants, which could potentially be removed.
Optical fiber was successfully developed in 1970 by Corning Glass Works, with attenuation low enough for communication purposes (about 20dB/km), and at the same time GaAssemiconductor lasers were developed that were compact and therefore suitable for transmitting light through fiber optic cables for long distances.
After a period of research starting from 1975, the first commercial fiber-optic communications system was developed, which operated at a wavelength around 0.8 µm and used GaAs semiconductor lasers. This first-generation system operated at a bit rate of 45 Mbps with repeater spacing of up to 10 km. Soon on 22 April 1977, General Telephone and Electronics sent the first live telephone traffic through fiber optics at a 6 Mbit/s throughput in Long Beach, California.
In October 1973, Corning Glass signed a development contract with CSELT and Pirelli aimed to test fiber optics in an urban environment: in September 1977, the second cable in this test series, named COS-2, was experimentally deployed in two lines (9 km) in Turin, for the first time in a big city, at a speed of 140 Mbit/s.[6]
The second generation of fiber-optic communication was developed for commercial use in the early 1980s, operated at 1.3 µm, and used InGaAsP semiconductor lasers. These early systems were initially limited by multi mode fiber dispersion, and in 1981 the single-mode fiber was revealed to greatly improve system performance, however practical connectors capable of working with single mode fiber proved difficult to develop. In 1984, they had already developed a fiber optic cable that would help further their progress toward making fiber optic cables that would circle the globe. Canadian service provider SaskTel had completed construction of what was then the world’s longest commercial fiberoptic network, which covered 3,268 km and linked 52 communities.[7] By 1987, these systems were operating at bit rates of up to 1.7 Gb/s with repeater spacing up to 50 km.
The first transatlantic telephone cable to use optical fiber was TAT-8, based on Desurvire optimized laser amplification technology. It went into operation in 1988.
Third-generation fiber-optic systems operated at 1.55 µm and had losses of about 0.2 dB/km. This development was spurred by the discovery of Indium gallium arsenide and the development of the Indium Gallium Arsenide photodiode by Pearsall. Engineers overcame earlier difficulties with pulse-spreading at that wavelength using conventional InGaAsP semiconductor lasers. Scientists overcame this difficulty by using dispersion-shifted fibers designed to have minimal dispersion at 1.55 µm or by limiting the laser spectrum to a single longitudinal mode. These developments eventually allowed third-generation systems to operate commercially at 2.5 Gbit/s with repeater spacing in excess of 100 km.
The fourth generation of fiber-optic communication systems used optical amplification to reduce the need for repeaters and wavelength-division multiplexing to increase data capacity. These two improvements caused a revolution that resulted in the doubling of system capacity every 6 months starting in 1992 until a bit rate of 10 Tb/s was reached by 2001. In 2006 a bit-rate of 14 Tbit/s was reached over a single 160 km line using optical amplifiers.[8]
The focus of development for the fifth generation of fiber-optic communications is on extending the wavelength range over which a WDM system can operate. The conventional wavelength window, known as the C band, covers the wavelength range 1.53-1.57 µm, and dry fiber has a low-loss window promising an extension of that range to 1.30-1.65 µm. Other developments include the concept of "optical solitons, " pulses that preserve their shape by counteracting the effects of dispersion with the nonlinear effects of the fiber by using pulses of a specific shape.
In the late 1990s through 2000, industry promoters, and research companies such as KMI, and RHK predicted massive increases in demand for communications bandwidth due to increased use of the Internet, and commercialization of various bandwidth-intensive consumer services, such as video on demandInternet protocol data traffic was increasing exponentially, at a faster rate than integrated circuit complexity had increased under Moore's Law. From the bust of the dot-com bubble through 2006, however, the main trend in the industry has been consolidation of firms and offshoring of manufacturing to reduce costs. Companies such as Verizon and AT&T have taken advantage of fiber-optic communications to deliver a variety of high-throughput data and broadband services to consumers' homes.
EXPECT THE COMPARISON IN COPPER WIRE / FIBRE OPTIC COMMUNICATION BY ANIL KUMAR LINES..PUT YOUR COMMENTS IN OUR BLOG

datas of U.S telephone industry

mail us: linestelecom@gmail.com/ lines_anil@hotmail.com(facebook*anilkumar lines)

Early U.S. Telephone Industry Data

The U.S. telephone industry developed through decentralized investment and the growth of many small businesses. This page provides data concerning the early development of the U.S. telephone industry. Contributions and corrections are welcomed. As always, verify and validate these resources as appropriate for your particular use.
A general source for early U.S. telephone industry data is U.S. Census Bureau, Bicentennial Edition: Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970 (GPO, 1975), Part II, Chapter R, Series R 1 to R 45. For convenient reference, here's an annual series of telephones in service from 1876 to 1981, based on FCC publications, and annual data on the share of U.S. households with telephone service, 1920 to 2007 (Excel version).

1. Telephone company statistics in the general censuses of 1880 and 1890

The Census of 1880 reports individual returns from 148 telephone companies. The returns are published as two tables, one of financial statistics and one of operating statistics, in vol. 4 of the 1880 Census report, pp. 787-96. A machine-readable dataset of selected statistics from these tables (plus state population figures) are available as the tab-delimited text file, telcos-1880.txt The first line of the dataset provides field names. The definitional relation between "number of subscriber stations" and "number of receiving telephones in use" isn't clear. The "adj. telephones" field has been created from the latter field, augmented with three values from the former field to replace missing values. Here's some analysis of the expenses per telephone.
The Census of 1890 collected a wider range of telephone statistics, but the published report provides only summary statistics. The published statistics are in Census Bulletin No. 196, Statistics of Manufactures: 1890; Operating Telephone Companies (June 25, 1892).

2. Telephone Censuses: 1902 to 1937

Every five years from 1902 to 1937, the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, carried out a Census of Electrical Industries. That census included a census of telephone and telegraph companies in the continental U.S. The report on the census of telephone companies does not include any company specific reports other than a separate statistical category for Bell System operating companies. Many telephone statistics are reported on a state-by-state basis.
Links to pdf-versions of the census of telephone reports are available from the Census website: 1902190719121917 (alt. 1917 on Google), 1922192719321937.
Posts on purplemotes include links to machine-readable compilations of some of these data. Here are links to some of the compilations:

3. AT&T Annual Reports

AT&T Annual Reports include operating and financial statistics going back to 1891. Early operating statistics include miles of wire (of various categories), number of exchanges and telephones, number of telephone conversations, and number of employees. Financial statistics are in balance sheet and income statements. Categories in these reports varies over time.
AT&T Annual Reports are available on microfiche in the Business Reference Room at the Library of Congress. The reports are also available through ProQuest Historical Annual Reports electronic database.
Some data from AT&T annual reports, for the years 1891 to 1937, are available online (Excel version).

4. ICC telephone company data

The Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) defined reporting requirement for telephone companies starting in 1913. The ICC defined Class A, Class B, and Class C telephone companies based on operating revenue thresholds. In addition, the ICC defined a Uniform System of Accounts (USOA) to standardize telephone company accounting.
class of telephone operating companyannual operating revneue thresholdUSOA effective data
Class Aover $250,000Jan. 1, 1913
Class Bover $50,000, not over $250,000Jan. 1, 1913
Class Cover $10,00, not over $50,000Jan. 1, 1915
On August 20, 1918, the ICC published a compilation of annual reports of telephone and telegraph companies for calendar year 1916. The motivation for this publication may have been the U.S. government take-over of all telephone and telegraph companies, effective Aug. 1, 1918. The compilation, published as a Memorandum, noted:
This memorandum was compiled from returns as made in the annual reports of telephone companies without any extensive investigation by the Commission as to their correctness. There were many obvious errors in the returns, especially of the smaller companies, and it has not been possible for the Bureau to correct all errors and inconsistencies discovered in the reports. The tabulation as a whole, however, will reflect the condition of the telephone business in the United States for the year ended December 31, 1916.
Image files for all the pages in the Memorandum are available in a source archive. The source includes data for 824 telephone companies. The U.S. telephone industry has also included many small telephone companies. Those companies are not included in this compilation.
Some of the telephone company data are available as a tab-delimited text file with field names on the first line. See dataset of U.S. telephone companies in 1916. Verify and validate these data as appropriate for your particular use.
In 1916, the ICC began requiring monthly reports from Class A carriers. Telephone counts from these reports were published in the Second FCC Report to Congress (1936), Table XV. These data are available in the worksheet, monthly telephones, 1915-1943.
In the National Archives, ICC telephone data is located with FCC records, Common Carrier Bureau (173.9).
Analysis and related data:
Sources relevant to ICC telephone returns:
United States. Interstate commerce commission. Memorandum Concerning Telephone Companies and Telegraph Companies Reporting to the Interstate Commerce Commission for the Calendar Year 1916. Washington, Government Printing Office, 1918.
United States. Interstate commerce commission. Uniform system of accounts for telephone companies [Class A and Class B]; effective on January 1, 1913. Washington, Government printing office, 1915. 79p.
United States. Interstate commerce commission. Uniform system of accounts for telephone companies, class C; effective on July 1, 1915. Washington, Government print- ing office, 1914. 44p.

5. Early FCC telephone company data

Since it was established by the Communications Act of 1934, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has published annually data on the communications industry. The FCC's First Annual Report to Congress (1935) included an appendix providing telephone company data for calendar year 1934. Subsequent annual reports covered the years 1935 to 1938. These reports do not include individual telephone operating company data. Early reports are available online: 19351936 (plus inserts), 1937 (plus fold-out), 19381939, and reports 1940-1965 (named year.pdf in same directory).
Telephone company data for 1939 was moved from the FCC's Annual Report to a new FCC publication entitled Statistics of the Communications Industry in the United States. The publication was renamed in 1957 as Statistics of Communications Common Carriers (SCCC or SOCC). It has continued annually to the present.
Statistics of the Communications Industry for 1939 (SCI, 1939) includes in Table 18 company-specific financial and operating statistics. The table includes Class A and Class B telephone operating companies subject to the FCC's annual reporting requirements. The FCC's definitions of Class A and Class B companies differs from the earlier ICC definitions. Under FCC definitions, Class A companies are companies with average annual operating revenues exceeding $100,000. Class B companies are companies with average annual operating revenues exceeding $50,000, but not more than $100,000. Under Section 2(b)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, the FCC's annual reporting requirements did not apply to the following carriers:
any carrier engaged in interstate or foreign communication solely through physical connection with the facilities of another carrier not directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by, or under direct or indirect common control with such carrier
These carriers are subject only to Sections 201 to 205 of Title II of the Communications Act.
Some carriers were also required to file monthly reports of telephones, revenues, and expenses. These monthly reports followed similar monthly reports that the ICC had required. Compilations of these monthly reports apparently were a valued industry resources. Under FCC rules, companies with annual operating revenues exceeding $250,000 and not excluded under Section 2(b)(2) of the Communications Act were required to file monthly reports. Some companies voluntarily filed monthly reports to be included in the FCC statistical compilations. SCI, 1939, observes (p. 3):
carriers filing annually and monthly are not altogether the same carriers, and for that reason the totals of certain items for the year do not agree. The totals for the carriers filing monthly are slightly greater because many large carriers subject only to sections 201-5 of the act file monthly but not annually.
Evidently carriers voluntarily filing monthly reports outweighed carriers with annual operating revenues exceeding $50,000, but not more than $250,000. The later carriers were required under FCC rules to file annual reports, but not monthly reports.
Operating and financial statistics for telephone companies reporting to the FCC for calendar year 1939 are available online both as images of the source document and as machine-readable text compilation of selected data fields. The sources are Table 1 and Table 18 of SCI, 1939. Table 1 provides a list of the 132 telephone carriers reporting statistics to the FCC. It describes the telephone carrier's size class (Class A or Class B), reporting class (1=annual and monthly, 2=only monthly, 3=only annually), regulatory class (1=full Title II, 2=only Sections 201-205 of Title II), whether the operating company has more than 50% of voting capital stock owned by AT&T or its subsidiaries (Bell system: y=yes, n=no), a geographical category, and the states of operation. Table 18 provides provides a wide range of financial and operating data for the 91 Class A and Class B telephone companies subject to full Title II regulation (companies filing annually). The companies accounted for about 97% of gross operating revenues of all telephone systems and lines in the U.S. (SCI, 1939, p.3).
Tables 1 and Table 18 are available online as a zipped archive of jpg images. The file names indicate table and page in the source.
Some of the data in Table 1 and Table 18 are available as machine-readable text. The data file sci-1939.txt is a tab-delimited text file with data field names in the first data row. It includes company names and company classifications, as well as counts of central offices and telephones by technology types. The field names correspond to field names in the source tables, or are as described above.
Subsequent annual FCC Statistics of the Communications Industry / Statistics of Communications Common Carriers include similar tables of company-specific financial and operating data. They also included tables of telephone companies reporting to the FCC, as well as tables of inter-corporate relations. The largest number of telephone companies reporting to the FCC was in 1942. Here's a machine readable dataset of communications companies reporting to the FCC in 1942. It includes company classifications and descriptive fields, as well as operating revenue. Here's an archive of images of the 1942 source table pages.
Related data and analysis:

Return to Galbi Think! communications policy analysis main page